Picture
In systems of proof based on the English common law  tradition, almost all evidence must be in a form of witness, who has sworn or solemnly affirmed to tell the truth. The bulk of the law of evidence regulates the types of evidence that may be sought from witnesses and the manner in which the interrogation of witnesses is conducted such as during direct examination and cross examination of witnesses. 


Today all persons are presumed  to be qualified to serve as witnesses in trials and other legal proceedings, and all persons are also presumed to have a legal obligation to serve as witnesses if their testimony is sought. However, legal rules sometimes exempt people from the obligation to give evidence and legal rules disqualify people from serving as witnesses under some circumstances.

Privilege rules give the holder of the privilege a right to prevent a witness from giving testimony. These privileges are ordinarily (but not always) designed  to protect socially valued types of confidential communications. For examples like; spousal privilege, advocate-client privilege,  doctor-patient privilege, state secrets privilege and clergy-penitent privilege. A variety of additional privileges are recognized in different jurisdictions, but the list of recognized privileges varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction; for example, some jurisdictions recognize a social worker–client privilege and other jurisdictions do not.

Witness competence rules are legal rules that specify circumstances under which persons are ineligible to serve as witnesses. For example, neither a judge nor a juror is competent to testify in a trial in which the judge or the juror serves in that capacity; and in jurisdictions with a dead man statute, a person is deemed not competent to testify as to statements of or transactions with a deceased opposing party.

Faelly


LUM CHOI YUEN A129960
12/13/2012 02:43:15 pm

First and foremost, I agreed in toto on the issue pertaining to the eligibility of witnesses under the ratio of avoiding conflict of interest that might be happened among judges. However, competency of witnesses should not be a barrier for PP in producing witnesses (even the weak witnesses) before the court. This is because witness testimony could be assessed under the basic of corroboration. In other words, the yardstick on measuring the competency of witnesses should not be highly weighted in assessing the accuracy of testimony given by the witnesses before the court of law. I am so impressed and feel trouble free as the competency of witness has been enshrined under S118 of Evidence Act 1950. Everyone should be competent to testify unless the capability of understanding the directed question is undermined.

Reply
Amani Evans
12/15/2012 09:10:58 pm

Hai Faelly,

I'm doing my own research and i have some question that maybe you could give your point of view. te questions are as foolows:

1. in case of spousal privilege, if a dispute arises in family court in any terms ie break-down of marriages, and etc, do the husband and wife must submit evidence to the court even if it concerns sensitive scenarios like 'in bed'?

2. what if the client who actually killed a person and runs towards an advocate and solicitors, and told the lawyer tat he actually killed te person, can the lawyer comply to the rules of court and told the court what actullay appen? ; eventhough he is defending the accused person?

Do let me know please. Thank you.

Reply
FAELLY a128160
12/15/2012 09:59:47 pm

Hai Amani Evans,

In answering your question:

1. the answer would be a yes, because if you can see Amani, if the spouses try to keep this kind of matters out form the dispute.. tere would be grey area for the court... tus, it would be muc appropriate to disclose this kind of matter.. however, no worries, outsiders , medias, etc will be excluded from the court form and only the court officers are allowed in the court room itself.

2. in this kind of situation, the lawyer have ethical Principe to old on to. he must never disclose the secret between him and his client in court room.. in criminal dispute, the accused person is innocent until proven guitly.

Reply
Nurul Hidayah bt Rohadi
12/15/2012 09:23:43 pm

idea yang sangat berguna...:)

Reply
pudin shila
12/15/2012 09:35:56 pm

* macam mana kalau saya pukul lawyer tu sampai mati sebab dia membocorkan rahsia saya kepada mahkamah.. ?
* bagaimana sekiranya tiba-tiba ada bukti yang sahih muncul selepas pesalah yang tadi elah dijatuhkan hukuman mandatori,
tolong bagi respon k.. thankz.. :)

Reply
Mohd sazwan bin ahmad
12/15/2012 09:38:50 pm

oke,saya mahu tanya berdasarkan tradisi common law Inggeris. hari ini suma saksi boleh memberi keterangan tpi ada masa orang tertentu dikecualikan untuk memberi keterangan. sapa orang itu? dan apa keadaan2 nya?

n untuk kes bunuh, boleh kah seseorang peguam bagi tertuduh membocorkan rahsia kepada mahkamah?

~penyataan yang sungguh baik~

Reply
si ampallll
12/15/2012 09:41:20 pm

mcmna kita mau tau tu org ckp benar ka tidak? mana drng blh dapat saksi ni?

Reply
safi
12/15/2012 09:45:09 pm

nak tanya, andai seseorang itu ada kes lama iaitu menjadi seorang pembunuh dan disabitkan membunuh tapi masih dalam perbicaraan, adakah beliau masih boleh atau diterima sebagai saksi dalam perbicaraan kes lain?
dan andai seorang peguam menarik diri dari membela seseorang pembunuh dalam kes bunuh, penarikan dirinya adalah disebabkan dia tdk mahu membela seorang pembunuh. adakah peguam itu boleh untuk memberi maklumat ataupun menjadi saksi kepada kes tersebut setelah penarikan dirinya dari membela pembunuh tadi.?

Reply
Eamon
12/15/2012 09:47:57 pm

Amazing date of post :P

And yeah, I whole heartedly agree!

Reply
sam
12/15/2012 09:55:04 pm

what do you think about Witness Protection Act?

Reply
Adib
12/15/2012 09:56:22 pm

boleh tolong dalam kes lim kar bee v duofortis? xfaham sgt

Reply
farnella
12/15/2012 09:57:51 pm

what the first step if people what to divorce? how long it will take?

Reply
petty
12/15/2012 10:48:50 pm

miss farnella..there are two separate judicial system govern the family matters in malaysia. which are under syariah and civil law..period for filing a divorce matter depend on each cases after take into consideration all the circumstances..

Reply
Faelly
12/15/2012 09:58:21 pm

Hai Amani Evans,

In answering your question:

1. the answer would be a yes, because if you can see Amani, if the spouses try to keep this kind of matters out form the dispute.. tere would be grey area for the court... tus, it would be muc appropriate to disclose this kind of matter.. however, no worries, outsiders , medias, etc will be excluded from the court form and only the court officers are allowed in the court room itself.

2. in this kind of situation, the lawyer have ethical Principe to old on to. he must never disclose the secret between him and his client in court room.. in criminal dispute, the accused person is innocent until proven guitly.

Reply
anynomous
12/15/2012 10:15:20 pm

my lecturer said "90 percent witnesses telling lies in court"..mostly the lawyers trained thier witness..so,there will no justice then..

Reply
harry
12/15/2012 10:46:54 pm

hello there,

what a very useful article you got there! well, all of us will be a witness of something in the future, regardless of whether we are bound to law. well, keep posting such information!

thanks a lot... =)

Reply
Pooh
12/15/2012 10:47:07 pm

I need dictionary..:D

Reply



Leave a Reply.


law of evidence